الخاقانية التوركية الأولى

(تم التحويل من First Turkic Khaganate)
الخاقانية التوركية
(Kök) Türk xanlïqï
Göktürk Kağanlığı
552–659
682–744
Flag of Göktürk Khaganate
Flag
خريطة الخانية التوركية وجيرانها في 570
خريطة الخانية التوركية وجيرانها في 570
Location of Göktürk Khaganate
الحالةخانية
Capitalأوتوكن
اللغات المشتركةالتوركية القديمة
الدين
تنگرية
قاغان 
• 551–552
بومين خاقان
• 553–572
Muqan Qaghan
• 682–691
Ilterish Qaghan
• 742–744
Ozmış Khagan
التشريعKurultai (Qurultay)
الحقبة التاريخيةPost-classical
542
• Established
552
ح. 582
630
659
• Ilterish Qaghan يؤسس الخاقانية التوركية الثانية
682
• الأويغور يهزمون Özmiş Khagan
744
المساحة
557[1][2]6،000،000 km2 (2،300،000 sq mi)
سبقها		 تلاها
خاقانية روران
الامبراطورية الهفتالية
الخزر
خانية كيمق
خاقانية الأويغور
دولة أوغوز يبگو

الخاقانية التوركية (التوركية القديمة: 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰:𐰜𐰇𐰛 Kök Türük; الصينية: 突厥汗国; پن‌ين: Tūjué hánguó) أو خاقانية الگوق‌تورك كانت خاقانية أسستها عشيرة أشينا من الگوق‌تورك في آسيا الداخلية القروسطية. وتحت قيادة بومين خاقان (ت. 552) وأبنائه، خلـَف الأشينا خاقانية روران كالقوة المهيمنة في الهضبة المنغولية وسرعان ما توسعوا في آسيا الوسطى. الخاقانية التوركية الأولى انهارت في 581، وتلاها سلسلة من النزاعات والحروب الأهلية التي فصمت الكيان السياسي إلى الخاقانية التوركية الشرقية والخاقانية التوركية الغربية. الخاقانية التوركية الشرقية أخضعتها أسرة تانگ في 630 وتفككت الخاقانية التوركية الغربية حوالي نفس الوقت. الخاقانية التوركية الثانية ظهرت في 682 واستمرت حتى 744 حين أطاح بها الأويغور، الذين كان جماعة أخرى ناطقة بالتوركية.

الخاقانية الأولى

انظر أيضاً: خط زمني للگوق‌تورك

Origin

The origins of the Turkic Khaganate trace back to 546, when Bumin Qaghan made a preemptive strike against the Uyghur and Tiele groups planning a revolt against their overlords, the Rouran Khaganate. For this service, he expected to be rewarded with a Rouran princess, thus marrying into the royal family. However, the Rouran khagan, Yujiulü Anagui, sent an emissary to Bumin to rebuke him, saying, "You are my blacksmith slave. How dare you utter these words?" As Anagui's "blacksmith slave" (الصينية: 鍛奴; پن‌ين: duànnú) comment was recorded in Chinese chronicles, some claim that the Göktürks were indeed blacksmith servants for the Rouran elite,[3][4][5][6] and that "blacksmith slavery" may have indicated a form of vassalage within Rouran society.[7] According to Denis Sinor, this reference indicates that the Turks specialized in metallurgy, although it is unclear if they were miners or blacksmiths.[8][9] Whatever the case, it was clearly indicated that the Turks were "slaves" that were not be taken literally, but rather a form of vassalage, or an unequal alliance.[10]

Panel from the Tomb of Anjia, a Sogdian trader (right), who is shown welcoming a Turkic leader (left, with long hair combed in the back). 579 CE, Xi'an, China.[11][12]

A disappointed Bumin allied with the Western Wei against the Rouran, their common enemy, by marrying Princess Changle. In 552, Bumin defeated Anagui and his forces north of Huaihuang (modern Zhangjiakou, Hebei).[13][14]

This effectively ended the Rouran, which had for the previous century and a half been the dominant power on the eastern steppe.[15]

التوسع غرباً

الخاقانية التوركية
نقوش في مدينة قزل
رسوم صخرية من گوق‌تورك منغوليا (القرون السادس للثامن).

Having excelled both in battle and diplomacy, Bumin declared himself Illig Khagan of the new Khaganate at Ötüken, but died only months later. He was succeeded by his son Qara who also died shortly. The newly established empire was then divided among Bumin's other son, Muqan Qaghan and his brother Istämi.[16]

A Turk mourning the Buddha, Kyzyl, Mingoi, Maya cave 224, 550-600 CE.[17][18]

Muqan ruled over the eastern part of the empire centered on Mongolia and defeated the Hephthalite Empire.[19][16] Bumin's brother Istämi (d. 576) bore the title "Yabghu of the West". This western branch of the Ashina clan was de facto independent while the eastern khagan was formally recognized as the senior. In 557, Istämi forged an alliance with Khosrow I of the Sassanid Empire of Iran to defeat and destroy the Hephthalites, who were allies of the Rouran. This resulted in the establishment of a common border between the two empires.[20][16] This war tightened the Ashina clan's grip on the Silk Road. The alliance with Northern China was further reinforced in 568 through the marriage of the Turkic princess Ashina, daughter of Muqan Qaghan, with Emperor Wu of the Xianbei-led Chinese Northern Zhou dynasty.

The appearance of the Pannonian Avars in the West has been interpreted as a nomadic faction fleeing the westward expansion of the Göktürks, although the specifics are a matter of debate given the lack of clear sources and chronology. Rene Grousset links the Avars with the downfall of the Hephthalites rather than the Rouran,[21] while Denis Sinor argues that Rouran-Avar identification is "repeated from article to article, from book to book with no shred of evidence to support it".[22]

Istämi's policy of western expansion brought the Göktürks into Europe.[23] In 576 the Göktürks crossed the Kerch Strait into the Crimea. Five years later they laid siege to Chersonesus; their cavalry kept roaming the steppes of Crimea until 590.[24] As for the southern borders, they were drawn south of the Amu Darya, bringing the Ashina into conflict with their former allies, the Sasanian Empire. In 589, the Sasanian Empire attacked and defeated the Türks.[25] Much of Bactria (including Balkh) remained a dependency of the Ashina until the end of the century.[24]

Relations with the Byzantine Empire

المقالة الرئيسية: Foreign relations of the Byzantine Empire § Göktürk relations: 6th–7th centuries

The Göktürks played a major role in the Byzantine Empire's relationship with the Persian Sasanian Empire.[26] First contact with the Byzantines is believed to have happened in 563 and relates to an incident in 558 where the slaves of the Turks (the Pannonian Avars) ran away during their war with the Hephthalites.[26][27]

The second contact occurred when Maniah, a Sogdian diplomat, convinced Istämi (also known as Silziboulos in Greek writings[28]) of the Göktürks to send an embassy directly to the Byzantine Empire's capital Constantinople, which arrived in 568 and offered silk as a gift to emperor Justin II and where they discussed an alliance. Justin II seems to have been more interested in securing an ally to the rear of the Sasanians with whom they had been in almost permanent conflict rather than the importation of silk. In 569 an embassy led by Zemarchus occurred which was well received and likely solidified their alliance for war.[26][29][30]

Another set of embassies occurred in 575–576 led by Valentine which were received with hostility by Turxanthos due to alleged treachery.[27] They required the members of the Byzantine delegation at the funeral of Istämi to lacerate their faces to humiliate them.[31] The subsequent hostility shown by the new ruler Tardu[31][32] would be matched in Byzantine writings.[33] With the insults reflecting a breakdown of the alliance, the likely cause is that the anger was due to the Turks not having their expectations met from their agreements and realising they were being used when they no longer aligned with the current goals of the Byzantine Empire (who correspondingly did not trust the Turks as partners).[26]

Civil war

المقالة الرئيسية: Göktürk civil war
Göktürk civil war
The khaganate in 552 after its division into Western Turkic Khaganate and Eastern Turkic Khaganate
Gokturk khaganates at their height, c. 600 AD:
  Western Gokturk: Lighter area is direct rule, darker areas show sphere of influence.[citation needed]
  Eastern Gokturk: Lighter area is direct rule, darker areas show sphere of influence.

When the fourth ruler of the khaganate, Taspar Qaghan, died in 581, the realm split in two over his succession.[14] He had willed the title of khagan to Muqan's son Apa Qaghan, but the high council appointed Ishbara Qaghan instead. Factions formed around both leaders. Before long, four rivals claimed the title. They were successfully played off against each other by the Sui and Tang dynasties.[citation needed]

Istämi's son, Tardu the leader of the western Turks, made a bid for total independence.[14] He seized the title and led an army east to claim the seat of imperial power, Ötüken.[citation needed]

In order to support his position, Ishbara of the Eastern Khaganate, acknowledged the suzerainty of Emperor Yang of Sui in order to seek their protection.[14] Tardu attacked Chang'an, the Sui capital, around 600, demanding Emperor Yangdi end his interference in the civil war. In retaliation, Sui diplomacy successfully incited a revolt of Tardu's Tiele vassals, which led to the end of Tardu's reign in 603. Among the dissident tribes were the Uyghurs and Xueyantuo.[citation needed]

Eastern Turkic Khaganate

المقالة الرئيسية: Eastern Turkic Khaganate
للمزيد من المعلومات: Tang campaign against the Eastern Turks
Early Turkic Khaganates
Shoroon Bumbagar tomb mural, Göktürk, 7th century CE, Mongolia.[37][38][39][40]

The civil war left the empire divided into eastern and western parts. The eastern part, still ruled from Ötüken, remained in the orbit of the Sui and retained the name Göktürk. Shibi Khan (609–619) and Illig Qaghan (620–630) attacked the Central Plain at its weakest moment during the transition between the Sui and Tang. Shibi Khan's surprise attack against Yanmen Commandery during an imperial tour of the northern frontier almost captured Emperor Yang, but his ethnic Han wife Princess Yicheng—who had been well treated by Empress Xiao during an earlier visit—sent a warning ahead, allowing the emperor and empress time to flee to the commandery seat at present-day Daixian in Shanxi.[41] This was besieged by the Turkic army on September 11, 615,[42][43] but Sui reinforcements and a false report from Princess Yicheng to her husband about a northern attack on the khaganate caused him to lift the siege before its completion.[41]

In 626, Illig Qaghan took advantage of the Xuanwu Gate Incident and drove on to Chang'an. On September 23, 626,[42] Illig Qaghan and his iron cavalry reached the bank of the Wei River north of Bian Bridge (in present-day Xianyang, Shaanxi). On September 25, 626,[42] Emperor Taizong of Tang met Illig Qaghan on the border bridge, Taizong accused Illig Qaghan of crossing the border, Illig saw that Taizong was imposing and mistakenly thought that the reinforcements from the Tang dynasty had arrived, and was asked to duel. Illig was afraid and agreed to retreat in an alliance, which is called the Weishui Alliance (渭水之盟) or the Alliance of Bian Qiao (便橋會盟 / 便桥会盟).[44] On the third day after the meeting, the Illig Qaghan sent 3,000 horses and 10,000 sheep to the border as compensation to the Tang dynasty, which Emperor Taizong did not accept, believing that this was too little.[45] All in all, 67 incursions into China proper were recorded.[24]

Before mid-October 627, heavy snows on the Mongolian–Manchurian grassland covered the ground to a depth of several feet, preventing the nomads' livestock from grazing and causing a massive die-off among the animals.[46] According to the New Book of Tang, in 628, Taizong mentioned that "There has been a frost in midsummer. The sun had risen from same place for five days. The moon had had the same light level for three days. The field was filled with red atmosphere (dust storm)."[47]

Illig Qaghan was brought down by a revolt of his Tiele vassal tribes (626–630), allied with Emperor Taizong of Tang. This tribal alliance figures in Chinese records as the Huihe (Uyghur).[48]

On March 27, 630,[42] a Tang army under the command of Li Jing defeated the Eastern Turkic Khaganate under the command of Illig Qaghan at the Battle of Yinshan (陰山之戰 / 阴山之战).[49][50][51] Illig Qaghan fled to Ishbara Shad, but on May 2, 630[52] Zhang Baoxiang's army advanced to Ishbara Shad's headquarters. Illig Qaghan was taken prisoner and sent to Chang'an.[51] The Eastern Turkic Khaganate collapsed and was incorporated into the Jimi system of the Tang. Emperor Taizong said, "It's enough for me to compensate my dishonor at Wei River."[50]

Western Turkic Khaganate

المقالة الرئيسية: Western Turkic Khaganate
للمزيد من المعلومات: Perso-Turkic war of 627–629, Tang campaigns against the Western Turks, and Conquest of the Western Turks
Western Turkic officers during an audience with king Varkhuman of Samarkand. 648–651, Afrasiyab murals, Samarkand.[53][54]

The Western khagan Shikui Khagan and Tong Yabghu Qaghan made an alliance with the Byzantine Empire against the Sasanian Empire and defeated the Sasanians in 628, successfully restoring the southern borders along the Tarim and Amu Darya rivers.[55] Their capital was Suyab in the Chu River valley, about 6 km (3.7 mi) south east of modern Tokmok. In 627 Tung Yabghu, assisted by the Khazars and Emperor Heraclius, launched a massive invasion of Transcaucasia which culminated in the taking of Derbent and Tbilisi. In April 630 Tung's deputy Böri Shad sent the Göktürk cavalry to invade Armenia, where his general Chorpan Tarkhan succeeded in routing a large Persian force. Tung Yabghu's murder in 630 forced the Göktürks to evacuate Transcaucasia.[citation needed]

The Western Turkic Khaganate was modernized through an administrative reform of the Ashina clan (reigned 634–639) and came to be known as the Onoq.[56] The name refers to the "ten arrows" that were granted by the Khagan to ten leaders (shads) of its two constituent tribal confederations, the Duolu (five churs) and Nushibi (five irkins), whose lands were divided by the Chui River.[56] The division fostered the growth of separatist tendencies. Soon, chieftain Kubrat of the Dulo clan, whose relationship with the Duolu is possible but not proven, seceded from the khaganate. The Tang dynasty campaigned against the khaganate and its vassals, the oasis states of the Tarim Basin. The Tang campaign against Karakhoja in 640 led to the retreat of the Western Turks, who were defeated during the Tang campaigns against Karasahr in 644 and the Tang campaign against Kucha in 648,[57][58] leading to the 657 conquest of the Western Turks by the Tang general Su Dingfang.[59] Emperor Taizong of Tang was proclaimed Khagan of the Göktürks in 658.[55]

Tang vassals

Turkic Balbal, Kyrgyzstan.[60][61]

The Tang retained a member of the Ashina clan as a puppet khagan of the Türks. In 639, Ashina Jiesheshuai attempted to kill Emperor Taizong of Tang but failed, causing him to relocate the Türks. These khagans were not well respected among their peers and a new group of leaders known as the Turgesh were established by 699.[62]

In 657, the Tang emperor could impose indirect rule along the Silk Road as far as modern-day Iran. He installed two khagans to rule the ten arrows (tribes) of Göktürks. The Five arrows of Tulu (咄陆) were ruled by khagans bearing the title of Xingxiwang (興昔亡可汗) while the Five Arrows of Nushipi (弩失畢可汗) were ruled by Jiwangjue (繼往絕可汗). The Five Tulu corresponded to the area east of Lake Balkash while the Five Arrows of Nushipi corresponded to the land east of the Aral Sea. The Göktürks now carried Chinese titles and fought by their side in their wars. The era spanning from 657 to 699 in the steppes was characterized by numerous rulers – weak, divided, and engaged in constant petty wars under the Anxi Protectorate until the rise of Turgesh.

The Second Turkic Khaganate was founded by Ilterish Qaghan after rebelling against the Tang in 681.[63]

الحرب الأهلية

مقال رئيسي: حرب الگوق‌تورك الأهلية
الخاقانيتان الغربية والشرقية في 600م
الخاقانيات التوركية الشرقية في 700م

الخاقانية التوركية الشرقية

مقال رئيسي: الخاقانية التوركية الشرقية
للمزيد من المعلومات: حملة تانگ ضد التورك الشرقيين


الخاقانية التوركية الغربية

مقال رئيسي: الخاقانية التوركية الغربية
للمزيد من المعلومات: الحرب التوركية الفارسية الثالثة, حملات تانگ ضد التورك الغربيين, and فتح التورك الغربيين


العادات والثقافة

النظام السياسي

Peter B. Golden points out that there is the possibility that the khaghans of the Turkic Khaganate, the Ashina, were themselves originally an Indo-European-speaking clan who later adopted Turkic, but inherited their original Indo-European titles.[64]

The Turkic temporary qaghan from the Ashina clan were subordinate to a sovereign authority that was left in the hands of a council of tribal chiefs[citation needed].

الدين
نصب جنائزي من القرن الثامن الميلادي، اِكتُشِف في "دونگوين شيري Dongoin Shiree"، شرق منغوليا، على بعد 500 كم شرق أوردو باليق، بين 2015-2017، ويتكون من تابوت محاط بأربعة عشر عامود حجري، منقوش عليهم عبارات رونية توركية، ومختومة بـتمغة على شكل رأس وعل. ويعود لأعلى مسئول في الخاقانية التوركية الثانية.[65] الصورة اليسرى هي لجزء من النقوش الرونية التوركية وتقول "يا بيتي، يا أرضي،". ويمكن قراءة ترجمة كاملة لنقوش النصب الجنائزي إلى اللغة التركية، هنا.


استقبلت الخاقانية مبشرين من الديانة البوذية، وهي التي أُدمِجت في التنگرية. وبعد سقوط الخاقانية، استقر العديد من اللاجئين في آسيا الوسطى، الشرق الأوسط وأوروپا، واعتنقوا الإسلام.


انظر أيضاً

الهامش

  1. ^ Turchin, Peter; Adams, Jonathan M.; Hall, Thomas D (December 2006). "East-West Orientation of Historical Empires". Journal of world-systems research. 12 (2): 222. ISSN 1076-156X. Retrieved 16 September 2016.
  2. ^ Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 129. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959.
  3. ^ 馬長壽, 《突厥人和突厥汗國》, 上海人民出版社, 1957, p. 10–11 (in صينية)
  4. ^ 陳豐祥, 余英時, 《中國通史》, 五南圖書出版股份有限公司, 2002, ISBN 978-957-11-2881-8, p. 155 (in صينية)
  5. ^ Gao Yang, "The Origin of the Turks and the Turkish Khanate", X. Türk Tarih Kongresi: Ankara 22 – 26 Eylül 1986, Kongreye Sunulan Bildiriler, V. Cilt, Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1991, s. 731. (in إنگليزية)
  6. ^ Oğuz, Burhan (1976). "«Demirci köle» olmaktan kurtulup reisleri Bumin'e". Türkiye halkının kültür kökenleri: Giriş, beslenme teknikleri (in التركية). İstanbul: Matbaası. p. 147. ISBN 9789758586226.
  7. ^ Moses, Larry W. (1976). "Relations with the Inner Asian Barbarian". In Perry, John Curtis; Smith, Bardwell Leith (eds.). Essays on Tʻang Society (in الإنجليزية). Leiden: Brill Archive. p. 65. ISBN 978-90-04-04761-7. 'Slave' probably meant vassalage to the Juan Juan [=Rouran or Ruanruan] qaghan, whom they [the Türks] served in battle by providing iron weapons, and also marching with the qaghan's armies.
  8. ^ Denis Sinor, Inner Asia: history-civilization-languages: a syllabus, Routledge, 1997, ISBN 978-0-7007-0380-7, p. 26. Contacts had already begun in 545 A.D. between the so-called "blacksmith-slave" Türk and certain of the kingdoms of north China,
  9. ^ Denis Sinor, ibid, p. 101. 'Beyond A-na-kui's disdainful reference to his "blacksmith slaves" there is ample evidence to show that the Turks were indeed specializing in metallurgy, though it is difficult to establish whether they were miners or rather blacksmiths.' (in إنگليزية)
  10. ^ Nachaeva (2011)
  11. ^ Baumer, Christoph (18 April 2018). History of Central Asia, The: 4-volume set (in الإنجليزية). Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 228. ISBN 978-1-83860-868-2.
  12. ^ أ ب Yatsenko, Sergey A. (August 2009). "Early Turks: Male Costume in the Chinese Art". Transoxiana. 14.
  13. ^ Linghu Defen et al., Book of Zhou, Vol. 50. (in صينية)
  14. ^ أ ب ت ث Kamola 2023, p. 13.
  15. ^ History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. 2006. p. 326. ISBN 978-9231032110.
  16. ^ أ ب ت History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. 2006. p. 327. ISBN 978-9231032110.
  17. ^ Yatsenko, Sergey A. (2009). "Early Turks: Male Costume in the Chinese Art Second half of the 6th – first half of the 8th cc. (Images of 'Others')". Transoxiana. 14: Fig.16.
  18. ^ Grünwedel, Albert (1912). Altbuddhistische Kultstätten Chinesisch Turkistan. p. 180.
  19. ^ Li Yanshou (李延寿), History of Northern Dynasties, Vol. 99.
  20. ^ Kamola 2023, pp. 13–14.
  21. ^ Grousset (1970, p. 82)
  22. ^ History and historiography of the Nomad Empires of Central Eurasia. D Sinor. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientarum Hung. 58 (1) 3 – 14, 2005
  23. ^ Walter Pohl, Die Awaren: ein Steppenvolk im Mitteleuropa, 567–822 n. Chr, C.H.Beck (2002), ISBN 978-3-406-48969-3, p. 26–29.
  24. ^ أ ب ت Grousset 81.
  25. ^ Kamola 2023, p. 14.
  26. ^ أ ب ت ث Qiang, Li; Kordosis, Stefanos (2018). "The Geopolitics on the Silk Road: Resurveying the Relationship of the Western Türks with Byzantium through Their Diplomatic Communications". Medieval Worlds (in الإنجليزية). medieval worlds (8): 109–125. doi:10.1553/medievalworlds_no8_2018s109. ISSN 2412-3196.
  27. ^ أ ب Sinor, Dennis (1996). The First Türk Empire (553–682). UNESCO. pp. 327–332. ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0. Retrieved 2022-01-23.
  28. ^ Eliot, C. (1908). Turkey in Europe. United Kingdom: E. Arnold. Page 76
  29. ^ Whittow, Mark (2018-04-26), "Byzantium's Eurasian Policy in the Age of the Türk Empire", in Di Cosmo, Nicola; Maas, Michael, Empires and Exchanges in Eurasian Late Antiquity (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–286, doi:10.1017/9781316146040.021, ISBN 978-1-316-14604-0, ""Mark Whittow directly suggests that this embassy reached an agreement for a joint attack on the Persians planned for 573." 
  30. ^ History of Civilizations of Central Asia. UNESCO. 2006. p. 328. ISBN 978-9231032110.
  31. ^ أ ب Menander, Protector, activeth century (1985). The history of Menander the Guardsman. R. C. Blockley. Liverpool, Great Britain: F. Cairns. pp. 173–177. ISBN 0-905205-25-1. OCLC 14355502.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  32. ^ Peter B. Golden (2011). Central Asia in World History. p. 39. At a subsequent embassy, Tardu yelled at Valentine in anger, venting his rage saying "Are you not those very Romans who use ten tongues and lie with all of them?
  33. ^ Maurice, Strategikon, ed. Dennis and Gamillscheg, 360;Maurice's Strategikon : handbook of Byzantine military strategy. Emperor of the East Maurice, Orbicius, George T. Dennis. Philadelphia. 1984. p. 116. ISBN 0-8122-7899-2. OCLC 9575024. They [the Turks] were superstitious, treacherous, foul, faithless, possessed by an insatiate desire for riches. They scorn their oath, do not observe agreements, and are not satisfied by gifts. Even before they accept the gift, they are making plans for treachery and betrayal of their agreements. They are clever at estimating suitable opportunities to do this and taking prompt advantage of them. They prefer to prevail over their enemies not so much by force as by deceit, surprise attacks, and cutting off supplies.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  34. ^ ALTINKILIÇ, Dr. Arzu Emel (2020). "Göktürk giyim kuşamının plastik sanatlarda değerlendirilmesi" (PDF). Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research: 1101–1110. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-10-22.
  35. ^ Inagaki, Hajime. Galleries and Works of the MIHO MUSEUM. Miho Museum. p. 121, panel 8.
  36. ^ Yatsenko, Sergey A. (2009). "Early Turks: Male Costume in the Chinese Art Second half of the 6th – first half of the 8th cc. (Images of 'Others')". Transoxiana. 14: Fig.9, 10.
  37. ^ ALTINKILIÇ, Dr. Arzu Emel (2020). "Göktürk giyim kuşamının plastik sanatlarda değerlendirilmesi" (PDF). Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research: 1101–1110.
  38. ^ Narantsatsral, D. "THE SILK ROAD CULTURE AND ANCIENT TURKISH WALL PAINTED TOMB" (PDF). The Journal of International Civilization Studies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-10-26.
  39. ^ Cosmo, Nicola Di; Maas, Michael (26 April 2018). Empires and Exchanges in Eurasian Late Antiquity: Rome, China, Iran, and the Steppe, ca. 250–750 (in الإنجليزية). Cambridge University Press. pp. 350–354. ISBN 978-1-108-54810-6.
  40. ^ Baumer, Christoph (18 April 2018). History of Central Asia, The: 4-volume set (in الإنجليزية). Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 185–186. ISBN 978-1-83860-868-2.
  41. ^ أ ب Xiong (2006), pp. 63–4
  42. ^ أ ب ت ث 武德九年 八月癸未 Academia Sinica Archived 2010-05-22 at the Wayback Machine (in صينية)
  43. ^ Sima Guang, Zizhi Tongjian, Vol. 182. (in صينية)
  44. ^ 司, 马光 (1086). 《资治通鉴·卷第一百九十一·唐纪七》. In 1086, the government of Emperor Shenzong of Song. pp. 《资治通鉴·卷第一百九十一·唐纪七》. 上自出玄武门，与高士廉、房玄龄等立骑径诣渭水上，与颉利隔水而语，责以负约。突厥大惊，皆下马罗拜。俄而诸军继至，旌甲蔽野，颉利见执失思力不返，而上挺身轻出，军容甚盛，有惧色。上麾诸军使却而布陈，独留与颉利语。萧瑀以上轻敌，叩马固谏，上曰："吾筹之已熟，非卿所知。突厥所以敢倾国而来，直抵郊甸者，以我国内有难，朕新即位，谓我不能抗御故也。我若示之心弱，闭门拒守，虏必放兵大掠，不可复制。故朕轻骑独出，示若轻之；又震曜军容，使之必战；出虏不意，使之失图。虏入我地既深，必有惧心，故与战则克，与和则固矣。制服突厥，在此一举，卿第观之！"
  45. ^ 刘, 昫 (945). 《旧唐书》本纪第二. Later Jin Shi Jingtang government. pp. 《旧唐书》本纪第二. 乙酉，又幸便桥，与颉利刑白马设盟，突厥引退。九月丙戌，颉利献马三千匹、羊万口
  46. ^ David Andrew Graff, Medieval Chinese warfare, 300–900, Routledge, 2002, ISBN 978-0-415-23955-4, p. 186.
  47. ^ Ouyang Xiu, New Book of Tang, Vol. 215-I (in صينية)
  48. ^ Liu 劉, Xu 昫 (945). Old Book of Tang 舊唐書 Vol.194 & Vol.195.
  49. ^ Old Book of Tang, Vol. 3. (in صينية)
  50. ^ أ ب Ouyang Xiu et al., New Book of Tang, Vol. 93. (in صينية)
  51. ^ أ ب Sima Guang, Zizhi Tongjian, Vol. 193. (in صينية)
  52. ^ 貞觀四年 三月庚辰
  53. ^ Baumer, Christoph (18 April 2018). History of Central Asia, The: 4-volume set (in الإنجليزية). Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 243. ISBN 978-1-83860-868-2.
  54. ^ Grenet, Frantz (2004). "Maracanda/Samarkand, une métropole pré-mongole". Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 5/6: Fig. B.
  55. ^ أ ب Kamola 2023, p. 15.
  56. ^ أ ب Gumilev 238.
  57. ^ Grousset 1970, pp. 99–100.
  58. ^ Wechsler 1979, pp. 225–228.
  59. ^ Skaff 2009, p. 183.
  60. ^ "Actual Problems of Archaeology and Ethnology of Central Asia".. "Current research shows that only during the time of the Turk qaghanates (552-630, 682-742 CE) were different types of stelae widely used in Inner Asia: there are rows of balbals in association with ritual sites, kamennye babas in association with memorials, and also inscription stelae were erected at important Turkic ritual sites [e.g., Kubarev, 1984; Voitov, 1996; Baiar, 1997]." 
  61. ^ Bazarov, B. V.; Institut mongolovedenii︠a︡, buddologii i tibetologii (Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ nauk. Sibirskoe otdelenie), eds. (2017). Aktualʹnye voprosy arkheologii i ėtnologii T︠S︡entralʹnoĭ Azii: materialy II mezhdunarodnoĭ nauchnoĭ konferent︠s︡ii, Ulan-Udė, 4-6 dekabri︠a︡ 2017 [Actual problems of archaeology and ethnology of Central Asia: materials of the II International conference (Ulan-Ude, 4-6th December, 2017)]. Ulan-Udė: Izd-vo BNT︠s︡ SO RAN. ISBN 978-5-7925-0494-3.
  62. ^ Kamola 2023, pp. 15–16.
  63. ^ Barfield 1989, p. 149.
  64. ^ Peter B. Golden, An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, O. Harrassowitz, 1992, p. 121-122
  65. ^ "Discovery of ruins of ancient Turkic monument surrounded by 14 pillars with inscriptions". جامعة أوساكا. 2017-12-8. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

ببليوجرافيا

  • Asimov, M.S. (1998), History of civilizations of Central Asia Volume IV The age of achievement: A.D. 750 to the end of the fifteenth century Part One The historical, social and economic setting, UNESCO Publishing 
  • Barfield, Thomas (1989), The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, Basil Blackwell 
  • Benson, Linda (1998), China's last Nomads: the history and culture of China's Kazaks, M.E. Sharpe 
  • Bregel, Yuri (2003), An Historical Atlas of Central Asia, Brill 
  • Bosworth, Clifford Edmund (2000), The Age of Achievement: A.D. 750 to the End of the Fifteenth Century - Vol. 4, Part II : The Achievements (History of Civilizations of Central Asia), UNESCO Publishing 
  • Bughra, Imin (1983), The history of East Turkestan, Istanbul: Istanbul publications 
  • Drompp, Michael Robert (2005), Tang China And The Collapse Of The Uighur Empire: A Documentary History, Brill 
  • Haywood, John (1998), Historical Atlas of the Medieval World, AD 600-1492, Barnes & Noble 
  • Latourette, Kenneth Scott (1964), The Chinese, their history and culture, Volumes 1-2, Macmillan 
  • Mackerras, Colin (1990), "Chapter 12 - The Uighurs", in Sinor, Denis, The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–342, ISBN 0 521 24304 1 
  • Millward, James A. (2007), Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang, Columbia University Press 
  • Mackerras, Colin, The Uighur Empire: According to the T'ang Dynastic Histories, A Study in Sino-Uighur Relations, 744-840. Publisher: Australian National University Press, 1972. 226 pages, ISBN 0-7081-0457-6
  • Golden, Peter B. (2011), Central Asia in World History, Oxford University Press 
  • Sinor, Denis (1990), The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-24304-9 
  • Xiong, Victor (2008), Historical Dictionary of Medieval China, United States of America: Scarecrow Press, Inc., ISBN 0810860538, http://www.amazon.ca/Historical-Dictionary-Medieval-Victor-Cunrui/dp/0810860538/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1438312041&sr=8-1&keywords=historical+dictionary+of+medieval+china 
  • Xue, Zongzheng (薛宗正). (1992). Turkic peoples (突厥史). Beijing: 中国社会科学出版社. ISBN 978-7-5004-0432-3; OCLC 28622013
تمّ الاسترجاع من "https://www.marefa.org/w/index.php?title=الخاقانية_التوركية_الأولى&oldid=4382051"